P&T
Our
Other
Journal
MediMedia Managed Markets
Managed Care

 

The Effect of Practitioner Compensation on HMO Consumer Satisfaction

MANAGED CARE April 2002. © MediMedia USA
Peer-Reviewed

The Effect of Practitioner Compensation on HMO Consumer Satisfaction

John F. Scoggins, PhD
Senior Economist, Research and Planning Consultants, Tampa
MANAGED CARE April 2002. ©MediMedia USA

John F. Scoggins, PhD, Senior Economist

Research and Planning Consultants, Tampa

ABSTRACT

This paper has undergone peer review by appropriate members of Managed Care's Editorial Advisory Board.

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that a health maintenance organization (HMO) consumer's satisfaction depends on the way his or her health plan compensates practitioners.

Design: Consumer Assessment of Health Plans (CAHPS) survey data from 1999 and 2000 were provided by the Office of Public Insurance Counsel for the state of Texas. These data were combined with the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures of managed care health plans in Texas published by the Texas Health Care Information Council.

Methodology: The study fitted the CAHPS survey data to an ordered-probit model. The dependent variable was customer satisfaction with the health plan, using a rating scale from 0–10. The independent variables included the percentage of health plan practitioners compensated with capitated fees, the percentage compensated with a bonus or withholding incentive, and other health plan and consumer characteristics.

Principal findings: Consumer satisfaction with HMOs is negatively correlated with the percentage of practitioners who are compensated on a capitated-fee basis and positively correlated with the percentage of practitioners compensated with a fee-withholding incentive (e.g., a fraction of fees that are withheld until specific quality and cost-control goals are reached). Neither the percentage compensated under a bonus incentive system nor the percentage of general practitioners with board certification correlated with HMO consumer satisfaction.

Conclusion: A managed health plan's method of practitioner compensation can affect participant satisfaction in a predictable manner.

Key terms: consumer satisfaction, capitated fees, fee-withholding

Author correspondence:
John F. Scoggins, PhD
Senior Economist
Research and Planning Consultants
3507 Frontage Rd., Suite 190
Tampa, FL 33607
Phone: (813) 387-0490
Fax: (813) 387-0493
E-mail: jscoggin@rpcconsulting.com

Meetings

Pharmaceutical Pricing and Contracting Conference Philadelphia, PA September 22–23, 2014
Private Health Insurance Exchanges Conference Washington, D.C. October 7–8, 2014
National Healthcare Facility Management Summit Palm Beach, FL October 16–17, 2014
National Healthcare CFO Summit Las Vegas, NV October 19–21, 2014
National Healthcare CXO Summit Las Vegas, NV October 19–21, 2014
Innovative Member Engagement Operations For Health Plans Las Vegas, NV October 20–21, 2014
4th Partnering With ACOs Summit Los Angeles, CA October 27–28, 2014
2014 Annual HEDIS® and Star Ratings Symposium Nashville, TN November 3–4, 2014
PCMH & Shared Savings ACO Leadership Summit Nashville, TN November 3–4, 2014
World Orphan Drug Congress Europe 2014 Brussels, Belgium November 12–14, 2014
Medicare Risk Adjustment, Revenue Management, & Star Ratings Fort Lauderdale, FL November 12–14, 2014
Healthcare Chief Medical Officer Forum Alexandria, VA November 13–14, 2014
Home Care Leadership Summit Atlanta, GA November 17–18, 2014