Most popular articles on this site Articles on pharmacy Articles on capitation Articles on disease management

www managedcaremag.com





MANAGED CARE January 2005. ©MediMedia USA













THE FORMULARY FILES

Formulary variability challenges physicians

A recent study indicates that more than 60 percent of drugs were preferred on two to four of the six California formularies evaluated.

"We described how much variability there was exhibited between formularies. The more variability, the harder it is for doctors to act as agents on behalf of their patients," says William H. Shrank, MD, lead author of the study. The researchers evaluated proton-pump inhibitors, statins, calcium-channel blockers, and ACE inhibitors. None of the drugs were preferred on all formularies in 2002, and 10 percent were not available on any of the formularies.

Formulary placement status of five major drug classes
Total formularies* offering drug in ...
AgentBlue ShieldAetnaHealthNetPacificareBlue CrossCigna20002002
Proton-pump inhibitors
Rabeprazole00/0200/0200/0200/02NP024/65/6
EsomeprazoleNPNPNPNPNPNP0/60/6
LansoprazoleNP00/02NPNP00/0200/023/63/6
OmeprazoleNPNP00NPNPNP1/60/6
Pantoprazole00/02NP00/0200/0202023/65/6
Statins
Fluvastatin00/0200/0200/02NP00024/65/6
Atorvastatin00/02NP00/02NP00/02NP3/63/6
Pravastatin02NP00/0200/02NP00/023/64/6
SimvastatinNP00/02NP02NP00/022/63/6
Calcium channel blockers
NicardipineNP02NP00/02NP002/62/6
IsradipineNPNPNP00/0200/0200/023/63/6
AmlodipineNP00/0200/0200/0200/02NP4/64/6
Felodipine00/020000/0200/0200/02NP6/65/6
Nisoldipine00/02NP00/0200/0200/02NP4/64/6
ACE inhibitors
QuinaprilNP00/0200/020200/0200/024/65/6
RamiprilNP02020202020/65/6
Benazepril00/02NP00/0200/0200/0200/025/65/6
TrandolapilNP02NP0200/0200/022/64/6
Moexipril00/02NP00/02NPNP021/63/6
Legend: 00, preferred in 2000; 02, preferred in 2002; NP, nonpreferred in 2000 or 2002.
*Fraction is the number of plans over the total number of plans studied
SOURCE: A BITTER PILL: FORMULARY VARIABILITY AND THE CHALLENGE TO PRESCRIBING PHYSICIANS. J AM BOARD FAM PRACTICE. 2004 NOV-DEC;17(6):401–407.
blog comments powered by Disqus