When medical necessity is disputed























With many people predicting passage of third-party-review and prudent-layperson legislation this year, some health plans may be forced to improve efforts to educate members about their own rules and procedures. A handful of HMOs surveyed by InterStudy Publications do not have written definitions of medical necessity that are applicable for dispute resolution, and more than a quarter do not make expense or benefit data for representative conditions available. Given that, it doesn't require a big leap to understand why the most common disputes HMOs faced in 1997 were related to rules — not diagnoses. One curious finding: While 95 percent of HMOs have a prudent-layperson standard for ER coverage, ER-claim denial was one of the most frequently appealed problems by HMO members.

SOURCE: HMO INDUSTRY REPORT 9.1, INTERSTUDY PUBLICATIONS, MINNEAPOLIS, 1999

Subscribe to Our Newsletters

Monthly table of contents

Be notified as each issue of Managed Care is available online.

Biweekly newsletter

Recent topics have included:

PTCommunity news

New drug approvals, clinical trials, drug management. Weekly.

UP NEXT