There has been a gradual decline in employer-sponsored retiree health benefits for much of the last decade; notably, fewer retirees are offered coverage for prescription drugs. A new analysis suggests that a prescription drug benefit in Medicare would reduce employer expense for health coverage — which, in turn, could encourage more employers to offer some form of drug coverage and thus reverse this erosion. The analysis found that under either of the two basic coverage proposals — a direct expansion of Medicare to include prescription benefits or optional drug coverage — employers would save money, regardless of whether they continue to pay for drug coverage, supplement the core Medicare benefit, or drop coverage altogether.
Projected employer savings under a direct expansion of Medicare |
|
| Employers who… |
Estimated savings*
|
| …retain current level of drug coverage by paying all pharmacy expenses, then take government subsidy for providing coverage |
8%
|
| …retain coverage by coordinating benefits (pay supplemental benefits not already covered by Medicare), and pay retiree’s Medicare pharmacy (Part D) premium |
10%
|
| …retain coverage by coordinating benefits, but require retiree to pay Part D premium |
23%
|
| …drop coverage, but pay Part D premiums |
67%
|
| …wash hands of all pharmacy responsibility |
79%
|
|
*Savings per retiree in 2003, when most coverage proposals would begin |
|
Projected employer savings under optional Medicare drug benefit |
|
| Employers who… |
Estimated savings*
|
| …retain current level of drug coverage by requiring retiree enrollment in optional Medicare pharmacy plan and coordinating benefits (pay supplemental benefits not already covered by Medicare), plus pay retiree’s premium for optional pharmacy plan |
5%
|
| … retain coverage by requiring retiree enrollment in optional Medicare pharmacy plan and coordinating benefits, but making retiree pay premium for Medicare drug plan |
29%
|
| … drop coverage, but pay retirees’ premiums for optional pharmacy plan |
55%
|
| … wash hands of all pharmacy responsibility |
79%
|
| *Savings per retiree in 2003, when most coverage proposals would begin | |
Paul Lendner ist ein praktizierender Experte im Bereich Gesundheit, Medizin und Fitness. Er schreibt bereits seit über 5 Jahren für das Managed Care Mag. Mit seinen Artikeln, die einen einzigartigen Expertenstatus nachweisen, liefert er unseren Lesern nicht nur Mehrwert, sondern auch Hilfestellung bei ihren Problemen.