With the aim of helping physicians deliver “high-value, cost-conscious health care,” the American College of Physicians updated its guidelines regarding screening for colorectal cancer. The main points, contained in a study in the March 6 edition of Annals of Internal Medicine, are that stool-based tests and flexible sigmoidoscopies be given consideration equal to colonoscopies for patients at average risk, and that patients 75 and older or who have a life expectancy of less than 10 years not be screened at all.

Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, senior medical associate at the American College of Physicians and author of the guidelines, says that “there is no evidence that screening more often … will result in improved patient outcomes.” He adds, “There is no one better test than the others. It depends on the medical circumstances and patient preferences. Those are the things that need to be kept in mind.”

The study says that “screening more frequently than recommended can contribute substantially to avoidable health care costs. The benefit of screening is reduced mortality and possibly reduced incidence, whereas the harms include perforation and major bleeding with endoscopic tests and exposure to radiation with radiologic tests.”

The study adds that “colonoscopy is overused in elderly patients, including repeated screening in less than 10-year intervals and routine screening of patients older than 80 years.”

Managed Care’s Top Ten Articles of 2016

There’s a lot more going on in health care than mergers (Aetna-Humana, Anthem-Cigna) creating huge players. Hundreds of insurers operate in 50 different states. Self-insured employers, ACA public exchanges, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid managed care plans crowd an increasingly complex market.

Major health care players are determined to make health information exchanges (HIEs) work. The push toward value-based payment alone almost guarantees that HIEs will be tweaked, poked, prodded, and overhauled until they deliver on their promise. The goal: straight talk from and among tech systems.

They bring a different mindset. They’re willing to work in teams and focus on the sort of evidence-based medicine that can guide health care’s transformation into a system based on value. One question: How well will this new generation of data-driven MDs deal with patients?

The surge of new MS treatments have been for the relapsing-remitting form of the disease. There’s hope for sufferers of a different form of MS. By homing in on CD20-positive B cells, ocrelizumab is able to knock them out and other aberrant B cells circulating in the bloodstream.

A flood of tests have insurers ramping up prior authorization and utilization review. Information overload is a problem. As doctors struggle to keep up, health plans need to get ahead of the development of the technology in order to successfully manage genetic testing appropriately.

Having the data is one thing. Knowing how to use it is another. Applying its computational power to the data, a company called RowdMap puts providers into high-, medium-, and low-value buckets compared with peers in their markets, using specific benchmarks to show why outliers differ from the norm.
Competition among manufacturers, industry consolidation, and capitalization on me-too drugs are cranking up generic and branded drug prices. This increase has compelled PBMs, health plan sponsors, and retail pharmacies to find novel ways to turn a profit, often at the expense of the consumer.
The development of recombinant DNA and other technologies has added a new dimension to care. These medications have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and many of the other 80 or so autoimmune diseases. But they can be budget busters and have a tricky side effect profile.

Shelley Slade
Vogel, Slade & Goldstein

Hub programs have emerged as a profitable new line of business in the sales and distribution side of the pharmaceutical industry that has got more than its fair share of wheeling and dealing. But they spell trouble if they spark collusion, threaten patients, or waste federal dollars.

More companies are self-insuring—and it’s not just large employers that are striking out on their own. The percentage of employers who fully self-insure increased by 44% in 1999 to 63% in 2015. Self-insurance may give employers more control over benefit packages, and stop-loss protects them against uncapped liability.