In the face of stiff competition from a growing category of dedicated wellness companies, major health plans are launching sophisticated, ambitious programs to slake employers’ thirst for these products
America’s health plans have heard the message: Employers want wellness services, and the plans are delivering with gusto. The nation’s biggest plans are rolling out slick programs that are designed to improve the health status of a client’s workforce by picking off the incubating health problems of each worker — one at a time if that’s what it takes.
Rooted in the philosophy of disease management, most wellness programs are designed to identify a worker’s health risks and intervene early and often. That means newsletters, online coaches, worksite programs, telephone calls from health coaches, reminders about doctor’s appointments, blood draws at the office, posters at the clinic. If a health threat can be remediated (obesity, smoking, poor nutrition, inactivity, stress overload) or managed (pregnancy, asthma, depression) there is a program tailored to do so.
“We see this as a huge opportunity,” says Christine Paige, senior vice president of Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, Calif. “Our program goes from wellness, prevention, and early detection all the way to chronic disease management. All of that makes people not only healthier, but also more functional, even while they are managing a disease.”
Kaiser and other health plans say those services make them more valuable to their clients, cementing relationships.
Joan Kennedy, senior vice president of WellPoint and president of its Health Management subsidiary, considers health optimization, as she calls it, to be the future of the health insurance industry. “The ability of WellPoint to play in that space is phenomenal because we have experience in all modalities of what an employer and employee need to manage and maximize health,” she says.
She and other leaders in the wellness movement at health plans make a convincing argument that workers’ health risks can, and must, be identified and mitigated before they turn into high-cost medical problems in the future.
Chris Coloian, vice president for health advocacy products at Cigna, points to two statistics — 66 percent of Americans are overweight and 20 percent smoke — as primary drivers for employers’ focus on wellness.
“This allows for dialogue between us and the consumer and the plan sponsor to really move to a new level,” he says.
That’s why Cigna and all the other national plans are rapidly adding new services, the most notable of which are health coaching programs. Most plans assign online and telephone coaches who work one on one with workers to get them to stop smoking, to manage their chronic condition, or to get off the couch, into the gym, and eating carrots instead of carrot cake.
Motivating someone to change behaviors is not easy. Cigna, Coloian says, has trained its coaches to “deeply find the motivation within an individual to help him make sustaining lifestyle changes that help him overcome something that is contributing to health risk in the future.”
Thomas D. Snook, a principal and actuary at Milliman, cautions against promising more than can be delivered. However, health plans say that the risk of providing wellness services to their clients’ workforce is outweighed by the risk of not engaging in them.
“You’ve got to go for the greater good of managing the health and wellness of the employer’s employee base in order to have an overall value proposition,” WellPoint’s Kennedy says. “That is a very different way of thinking. I think it’s more risky if you aren’t thinking that way because you will no longer be competitive in the market. We believe that’s where the industry is going.”
Some observers say that the enthusiasm of health plan executives is fueled by panic. Specialty wellness vendors are merging, increasing the breadth of services they can offer to employers and encroaching into areas that health plans once owned.
“The specialty vendors have started to expand their services to a point where they are not just keeping healthy people healthy and doing disease management, they are also taking on case and utilization management,” says Sue Willette, head of Mercer’s health and productivity management group. “The health plans are at risk for becoming claims processors and contracting with physicians.”
Indeed, even those roles may be at risk, she says.
“As you see the demand for high quality physician networks increase, you probably are going to see the advent of other types of organizations doing direct contracting and, again, putting health plans more at risk for losing a book of business,” she says.
Others question whether employers and insurers can truly be aligned in the wellness movement. Employers can expect a quick return on their investment in wellness. An employee who starts working out, for example, may curtail sick days and exhibit more energy after just a short time.
“Employers are interested not only in how much their health insurance costs but also how often people show up to work, how they feel when they’re at work and, as a consequence, how productive they are at work,” Snook says. “The time horizon for seeing wellness programs pay off for employers is pretty quick — a couple of years, maybe even shorter.”
In contrast, the financial benefits to insurers will come much later. The employee’s workouts may stave off a heart attack that would otherwise occur 20 years in the future. By that time, the individual has probably moved on to another insurance company or to the Medicare rolls.
“The health plans do not have a financial incentive to invest long-term for the well-being of their insureds,” he says.
Peter Boland, president of Boland Healthcare, says health plans measure success by their control of medical trend rates, while employers are focused on the broader goal of worker productivity.
“The employer’s issue is how to keep people from getting sick in the first place, because once they get sick, the barn door has been opened,” he says. “Is it in the health plan’s interest to prevent illnesses? Not necessarily, because they’re paid on volume and how much money is going through the system.”
From the health plans’ perspective, the viability of wellness services will be evaluated on the expense of offering the services and the savings that come from them.
“The key variables are: How many employees and families make use of these services, what do those people look like from a demographic standpoint, and is there any cost savings to be had in the medium term?” says Snook, the actuary.
All too soon to know, he adds. If relatively few employees use wellness programs, the expense of offering them will be minimal. On the other hand, if already-health-conscious workers are the primary users, the savings from reduced claims will be small since those people are not high cost anyway.
“But if you’re really hitting the target population — the people who don’t exercise and the people who eat wrong — then it could be more effective in cutting costs,” he says.
This is not to say Snook is against the programs.
“I think this wellness thing is really a good idea, and I’d be very happy to see it succeed,” he says.
$100 million on a fad?
WellPoint’s Kennedy has invested nearly $100 million to develop 360° Health, and programs are still being rolled out. The subsidiary she runs, Health Management, employs 1,500 people, mostly health care professionals providing wellness services directly to WellPoint clients. As many as 800 may be added in the year ahead.
“We’re really focusing on what we call health optimization — how do you achieve, at an individual level for an employee, optimal health,” Kennedy says. “We see that health optimization being the next generation, and we just need to continue to work to slowly bring that integrated solution together as our core product.”
Other nationwide health plans share that focus, although the terminology, goals, and measurement of the wellness movement have yet to become settled.
Kaiser Permanente knows that its clients eventually will want to know how wellness programs are affecting worker productivity. Paige says that ways to measure the outcomes of wellness programs must be developed.
“We’re very interested in working with our customers in developing those kinds of tools because there is literature out there that says issues of productivity far outweigh the direct medical costs that an employer experiences,” Paige says.
Meanwhile, in some cases, Cigna is already guaranteeing that its customers will benefit from wellness programs.
“In our chronic care program and some of our case management programs, we guarantee financial results, the effect on medical cost and improved productivity,” Coloian says. “Even though the results are usually 12 to 36 months in the making, we are making sure our customers understand we are delivering the programs as we promised.”
Consumer-directed plans encourage wellness activities
Whether consumer-directed health plans are booming or bombing continues to be under debate, but no one argues this point: CDHP-related concepts are all over the health insurance industry today.
Offering wellness services to improve a plan member’s health status and using incentives to encourage participation are two shining examples.
Both concepts were novelties when CDHP designs emerged. Today, the wellness movement is the hottest trend in town, and incentives are a routine component of plan offerings.
For example, Aetna Healthy Actions, launched last fall, combines rewards, discounts and incentive programs.
Funded by plan sponsors, incentives range from pedometers and water bottles to credits that can be used to satisfy an employee’s deductible or coinsurance. Aetna also offers discounts on gift certificates for restaurants and other retail purchases to members who receive routine preventive care, complete a health assessment, or engage in other wellness programs.
While health plans are offering wellness programs to members in all or most plans, the programs may resonate more with CDHP members. In a 2007 survey of CDHP members, the Blue Cross & Blue Shield Association found that CDHP members were more likely to engage in wellness programs than people in other plans.
Companies demand. Will health plans deliver?
It may look as if every employer in America wants wellness programs for its workers in the hope of reducing health care cost outlays, but that is not the full story. What they ultimately want, say the consultants who advise them, is a more productive workforce.
“They are really concerned about productivity and total cost of care,” says Peter Boland, president of Boland Healthcare. “They’re looking at disability, replacement, presenteeism, direct and indirect health costs. They realize they are going to have to intervene with an array of proven wellness activities because it’s in their interest to do it.”
Thus, the explosion in demand for wellness programs indicates that the health status of workers has become a C-suite priority.
“It’s the CEO that’s asking. It’s the CFO that’s interested,” says Sue Willette, head of Mercer’s health and productivity management group. “And it’s because they see the direct impact of health on their bottom line.”
Traditionally employers have looked at health benefits and absence management separately. Increasingly, however, employers look at a worker’s frequent sick days and wonder if stress management training might help. Could a disability claim have been avoided if the employee had been offered help to stop smoking? Would a weight-management program reduce the number of knee-replacement surgeries?
“Employers understand that some of the costs that they experience or loss of productivity among their employees relate to things that might be affected by not waiting until someone has developed a chronic disease, but rather by trying to get the right behaviors in place earlier on,” says Christine Paige, senior vice president of Kaiser Permanente.
Thus, employers are asking for a wide range of programs to improve the health of their workforce. That means an opportunity for health plans, and possibly a threat.
Although the theory of managed care said that health plans would encourage preventive care and manage chronic conditions, their failure to do so has prompted hundreds of specialty vendors to offer everything from disease and case management to smoking cessation programs and lifestyle coaching.
“Now the health plans are scrambling, saying, ‘We can do this. We can do this,’” Willette says.
And clearly they can — to a certain extent. Mercer’s survey of employers with 500 employees or more found that 65 percent of employers that offer wellness programming opt for the standard programs offered through their health plans.
At the other end of the spectrum, about 3 percent of employers are contracting with many specialty vendors, looking for “best practice” providers for health risk assessments, disease management, and other wellness offerings.
Another 17 percent of employers primarily use the wellness services provided by their health plans, but buy some services — for example, screening programs — from other vendors. And 12 percent of employers outsource wellness services to a single master contractor who promises to procure “best practice” services.
“The thing that scares the health plans the most is that those 12 percent are the cutting-edge employers,” she says. “They’re the ones that have researchers and they are culling the data and making decisions and measuring impacts.”
The percentage of employers that primarily opt for wellness vendors other than their health plan is growing. “If the trend continues, that’s vulnerability for the health plans,” Willette says.
Indeed, the rapid growth of onsite medical clinics, which generally operate outside an employer’s relationship with any health plan, shows how serious corporate America is about taking control of its workers’ health. At recent employer conferences, Willette says, onsite clinics were the hottest topic on tap.
“Employers are either looking at feasibility of onsite clinics or redefining what they currently have,” she says. “That clinic can be the onsite resource to help with integration of occupational, nonoccupational, and primary care, and be the storefront for the culture of health.”
Faced with such trends, health plans must find ways to be relevant to their clients.
“There are a lot of opportunities out there for them to reinvent themselves and be different,” Willette says. “The innovation is out there. The employers are pushing for it and I think the future is going to those health plans that can really evolve into something that they’re not today.
No wonder employers are pushing wellness: They can expect a quick return on their investment. An employee who starts working out, for example, may curtail sick days and exhibit more energy after just a short time.
Relative importance of wellness program objectives
Percent of U.S. employers that consider this very important
Source: Working Well: A Global Survey of Health Promotion and Workplace Wellness Strategies, Buck Consultants, 2007
What employers have on tap
In a survey of 466 employers with a mean of 12,500 employees, employee assistance programs and immunizations were the most frequently offered wellness programs last year.
Source: Working Well: A Global Survey of Health Promotion and Workplace Wellness Strategies, Buck Consultants, 2001
Paul Lendner ist ein praktizierender Experte im Bereich Gesundheit, Medizin und Fitness. Er schreibt bereits seit über 5 Jahren für das Managed Care Mag. Mit seinen Artikeln, die einen einzigartigen Expertenstatus nachweißen, liefert er unseren Lesern nicht nur Mehrwert, sondern auch Hilfestellung bei ihren Problemen.