Mergers and Acquisitions Among Biopharma Companies Expected To Soar This Year

The efforts by government and private insurers to reign in drug increases is one of the reasons that this could be a banner merger and acquisition (M&A) year for biopharma companies, according to the consulting company EY’s M&A Outlook and Firepower Report 2017. The companies see M&A as a way to make up for shortfalls in revenue that the payers’ push for lower prices have caused. Also fueling this trend is how biopharma companies’ valuations leveled off last year, according to The expected M&A scramble is a switch from 2014 and 2015 when biopharma companies entered the stock market via initial public offerings (IPA).


There’s also expectations that business-friendlier policies of the Trump administration will drive M&A activity, especially his proposal to repatriate overseas profits back to the United States. That will mean at least $100 billion more for biopharma M&A, according to Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News.

Also, finding opportunities in traditional growth areas has become more difficult. Once breakthrough drugs for autoimmune disease and cancer now occupy crowded therapeutic battlefields, forcing companies to tackle financially high-risk conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Jeffrey Greene, EY Global Life Sciences Transaction Advisory Services Leader, says:

“Over the next 12 months, biopharma dealmaking could reach unprecedented heights with big pharma possessing both the firepower and the growth imperative to take it there,” Jeffrey Greene, EY global life sciences transaction advisory services leader tells StreetInsider. “In this potentially frenetic deal environment, companies will need to be prepared to move quickly to make the right strategic acquisition on the right terms.”

Source: Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News


Managed Care’s Top Ten Articles of 2016

There’s a lot more going on in health care than mergers (Aetna-Humana, Anthem-Cigna) creating huge players. Hundreds of insurers operate in 50 different states. Self-insured employers, ACA public exchanges, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid managed care plans crowd an increasingly complex market.

Major health care players are determined to make health information exchanges (HIEs) work. The push toward value-based payment alone almost guarantees that HIEs will be tweaked, poked, prodded, and overhauled until they deliver on their promise. The goal: straight talk from and among tech systems.

They bring a different mindset. They’re willing to work in teams and focus on the sort of evidence-based medicine that can guide health care’s transformation into a system based on value. One question: How well will this new generation of data-driven MDs deal with patients?

The surge of new MS treatments have been for the relapsing-remitting form of the disease. There’s hope for sufferers of a different form of MS. By homing in on CD20-positive B cells, ocrelizumab is able to knock them out and other aberrant B cells circulating in the bloodstream.

A flood of tests have insurers ramping up prior authorization and utilization review. Information overload is a problem. As doctors struggle to keep up, health plans need to get ahead of the development of the technology in order to successfully manage genetic testing appropriately.

Having the data is one thing. Knowing how to use it is another. Applying its computational power to the data, a company called RowdMap puts providers into high-, medium-, and low-value buckets compared with peers in their markets, using specific benchmarks to show why outliers differ from the norm.
Competition among manufacturers, industry consolidation, and capitalization on me-too drugs are cranking up generic and branded drug prices. This increase has compelled PBMs, health plan sponsors, and retail pharmacies to find novel ways to turn a profit, often at the expense of the consumer.
The development of recombinant DNA and other technologies has added a new dimension to care. These medications have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and many of the other 80 or so autoimmune diseases. But they can be budget busters and have a tricky side effect profile.

Shelley Slade
Vogel, Slade & Goldstein

Hub programs have emerged as a profitable new line of business in the sales and distribution side of the pharmaceutical industry that has got more than its fair share of wheeling and dealing. But they spell trouble if they spark collusion, threaten patients, or waste federal dollars.

More companies are self-insuring—and it’s not just large employers that are striking out on their own. The percentage of employers who fully self-insure increased by 44% in 1999 to 63% in 2015. Self-insurance may give employers more control over benefit packages, and stop-loss protects them against uncapped liability.